![]() 3 On the other hand, most objective measures of voice quality do not correspond with the perceived changes in quality and are often unsuitable for many dysphonic voices when the vocal acoustic signals depart significantly from periodicity. 2, 3 Subjective assessment protocols suffer from poor consistency within and across raters. While the trained clinical ear, often considered the “gold standard,” can detect differences in voice quality pre- and post-treatment, current approaches to quantify these changes have had limited success. Therefore, assessing voice quality during the diagnostic process and monitoring changes in voice quality over the course of treatment are essential. Over 30% of the adult population will experience a voice disorder during their lifetime, 1 and a change in voice quality is one of the primary complaints of these patients. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |